<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tilman Santarius &#187; Klimapolitik</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.santarius.de/thema/klimapolitik/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.santarius.de</link>
	<description>Website Texte und Themen von Tilman Santarius</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 16:59:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Climate justice and digitalization. A plea to consider broader socio-economic implications of digitalization and climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.santarius.de/en/2602/climate-justice-digitalization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.santarius.de/en/2602/climate-justice-digitalization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 16:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tilman Santarius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Allgemein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digitalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Klimapolitik]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santarius.de/?p=2602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Cover-GAIA-Climate-Justice.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2603" title="Cover GAIA Climate Justice" src="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Cover-GAIA-Climate-Justice-224x300.jpg" alt="" width="157" height="211" /></a>This <a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Climate-Justice-and-Digitalization-GAIA-2022.pdf">article by Tilman Santarius in the Journal GAIA Justice and Digitalization - GAIA 2022</a> considers the broader socio-economic implications of digitalization on various dimensions of climate justice. Indeed, digitalization will affect the way the impacts of global warming and the co-benefits of climate protection are distributed. To advance fair benefit sharing of digital climate technologies, the decentralization of technological development must be initiated, and rules for fair competition must be established.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Cover-GAIA-Climate-Justice.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2603" title="Cover GAIA Climate Justice" src="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Cover-GAIA-Climate-Justice-224x300.jpg" alt="" width="157" height="211" /></a>This <a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Climate-Justice-and-Digitalization-GAIA-2022.pdf">article by Tilman Santarius in the Journal GAIA Justice and Digitalization &#8211; GAIA 2022</a> considers the broader socio-economic implications of digitalization on various dimensions of climate justice. Indeed, digitalization will affect the way the impacts of global warming and the co-benefits of climate protection are distributed. To advance a fair benefit sharing of digital climate technologies, the decentralization of technological development must be initiated, and rules for fair competition must be established.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.santarius.de/en/2602/climate-justice-digitalization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exploring energy sufficiency: New challenges and options in times of crisis.</title>
		<link>http://www.santarius.de/en/2593/english-exploring-energy-sufficiency-new-challenges-and-options-in-times-of-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.santarius.de/en/2593/english-exploring-energy-sufficiency-new-challenges-and-options-in-times-of-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 16:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tilman Santarius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Allgemein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Klimapolitik]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santarius.de/?p=2593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Cover-TaTuP-copy.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2596" title="Cover TaTuP" src="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Cover-TaTuP-copy-225x300.jpg" alt="" width="158" height="210" /></a>The war in Ukraine has made the fatal dependence of many countries on energy sources from non-democratic countries extremely clear. How should politics and society react to high energy prices and the necessary ban on imports of fossil fuels from Russia? Can modern societies get along with much less energy? This Op-Ed <a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/TATuP_2022_2_Gesamt_Druckfahne.pdf">article by Benjamin Best, Michaela Christ, Tilman Santarius and Frauke Wiese Energy in the Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice</a> argues that the concept of energy sufficiency can play an important role in answering these questions. The article explores sufficiency as a interdisciplinary research topic for energy modelling, scenarios and policy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Cover-TaTuP-copy.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2596" title="Cover TaTuP" src="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Cover-TaTuP-copy-225x300.jpg" alt="" width="158" height="210" /></a>The war in Ukraine has made the fatal dependence of many countries on energy sources from non-democratic countries extremely clear. How should politics and society react to high energy prices and the necessary ban on imports of fossil fuels from Russia? Can modern societies get along with much less energy? This Op-Ed <a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/TATuP_2022_2_Gesamt_Druckfahne.pdf">article by Benjamin Best, Michaela Christ, Tilman Santarius and Frauke Wiese Energy in the Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice</a> argues that the concept of energy sufficiency can play an important role in answering these questions. The article explores sufficiency as a interdisciplinary research topic for energy modelling, scenarios and policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.santarius.de/en/2593/english-exploring-energy-sufficiency-new-challenges-and-options-in-times-of-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digitalization and Energy Consumption. Does ICT Reduce Energy Demand?</title>
		<link>http://www.santarius.de/en/2324/digitalization-energy-consumption-decoupling-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.santarius.de/en/2324/digitalization-energy-consumption-decoupling-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2020 10:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tilman Santarius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Allgemein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digitalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Klimapolitik]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santarius.de/?p=2324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Digitalization is said to bear large potentials to reduce energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions. At the same time, criticism has been raised that digitalization may increase energy demand. Which effect will overall digitalization of the economy and society bring about? This article by Steffen Lange, Johanna Pohl and Tilman Santarius in the journal Ecological Economics combines empirical and theoretical findings from debates on decoupling energy consumption from economic growth and from debates on green IT and ICT for sustainability and finds four distinctive effects. The overall conclusion is: Digitalization will not automatically bring about reductions in energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions, but needs to be actively shaped by policies and measures in order to deliver those. &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/X09218009.jpg" alt="Cover image Ecological Economics" width="175" height="233" />Digitalization is said to bear large potentials to reduce energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions. At the same time, criticism has been raised that digitalization may increase energy demand. Which effect will overall digitalization of the economy and society bring about? This <a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Digitalization-and-energy-consumption-Ecological-Economics-LangePohlSantarius-2020.pdf">article by Steffen Lange, Johanna Pohl and Tilman Santarius in the journal Ecological Economics</a> combines empirical and theoretical findings from debates on decoupling energy consumption from economic growth and from debates on green IT and ICT for sustainability and finds four distinctive effects. The overall conclusion is: Digitalization will not automatically bring about reductions in energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions, but needs to be actively shaped by policies and measures in order to deliver those.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.santarius.de/en/2324/digitalization-energy-consumption-decoupling-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rethinking Climate and Energy Policies.</title>
		<link>http://www.santarius.de/en/1530/rethinking-climate-and-energy-policies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.santarius.de/en/1530/rethinking-climate-and-energy-policies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tilman Santarius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Allgemein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Klimapolitik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homepage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wirtschaft & Nachhaltigkeit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santarius.de/?p=1530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Title-Page-Rethinking-Climate-and-Energy-Policies.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1531" title="Title Page Rethinking Climate and Energy Policies" src="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Title-Page-Rethinking-Climate-and-Energy-Policies.jpg" alt="" width="153" height="230" /></a>This volume, edited by Tilman Santarius, Hans Jakob Walnum and Carlo Aall, suggests rethinking current climate, energy and sustainability <span style="font-size: 13px;">policy-making by presenting new insights into the rebound phenomenon</span><span style="font-size: 13px;">. It</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"> offers new aspects in rebound economics, but then</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"> explores multidisciplinary perspectives on the phenomenon</span><span style="font-size: 13px;">. The volume puts</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"> rebounds into praxis and presents several policy cases </span><span style="font-size: 13px;">and sector-specific approaches, including labour markets, urban planning, tourism, </span><span style="font-size: 13px;">information and communication technologies, and transport. It finally embeds the issue into the larger debate on decoupling, green growth and degrowth, and sketches out lessons learned for sustainable development strategies and policies at large.</span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Title-Page-Rethinking-Climate-and-Energy-Policies.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1531" title="Title Page Rethinking Climate and Energy Policies" src="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Title-Page-Rethinking-Climate-and-Energy-Policies.jpg" alt="" width="153" height="230" /></a>This volume, edited by Tilman Santarius, Hans Jakob Walnum and Carlo Aall, suggests rethinking current climate, energy and sustainability <span style="font-size: 13px;">policy-making by presenting new insights into the rebound phenomenon</span><span style="font-size: 13px;">. It</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"> offers new aspects in rebound economics, but then</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"> explores multidisciplinary perspectives on the phenomenon</span><span style="font-size: 13px;">. The volume puts</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"> rebounds into praxis and presents several policy cases </span><span style="font-size: 13px;">and sector-specific approaches, including labour markets, urban planning, tourism, </span><span style="font-size: 13px;">information and communication technologies, and transport. It finally embeds the issue into the larger debate on decoupling, green growth and degrowth, and sketches out lessons learned for sustainable development strategies and policies at large.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">See here the <a title="Rethinking Climate and Energy Policies." href="http://www.springer.com/us/book/9783319388052" target="_blank">link to Rethinking Climate and Energy Policy</a> to view the table of content and download the book or singular chapters of the book. </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.santarius.de/en/1530/rethinking-climate-and-energy-policies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Energy efficiency, human behavior, and economic growth</title>
		<link>http://www.santarius.de/en/1360/rebound-effekt-und-sozial-%c3%b6kologische-transformation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.santarius.de/en/1360/rebound-effekt-und-sozial-%c3%b6kologische-transformation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tilman Santarius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Allgemein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Klimapolitik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homepage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wirtschaft & Nachhaltigkeit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santarius.de/?p=1360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Cover-AIP-Proceedings.gif"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1426" title="Cover AIP Proceedings" src="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Cover-AIP-Proceedings-234x300.gif" alt="" width="150" height="192" /></a>Increasing energy efficiency in households, transportation, industries, and services is an important strategy to reduce energy service demand to levels that allow the steep reduction of greenhouse gases. Yet, technological efficiency improvements may generate so-called rebound effects, which may ‘eat up’ parts of the technical savings potential. This <a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Energy-Efficiency-human-behavior-and-economic-growth-AIP-2015.pdf">chapter in the "Physics for Sustainable Energy II conference proceedings"</a> provides a comprehensive review of existing research on these effects, raises critiques, and points out open questions. As a rough “rule of thumb”, about half the savings potential of energy efficiency improvements may be ‚eaten up’ by rebound effects.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Cover-AIP-Proceedings.gif"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1426" title="Cover AIP Proceedings" src="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Cover-AIP-Proceedings-234x300.gif" alt="" width="150" height="192" /></a>Increasing energy efficiency in households, transportation, industries, and services is an important strategy to reduce energy service demand to levels that allow the steep reduction of greenhouse gases, and a full fledged switch of energy systems to a renewable basis. Yet, technological efficiency improvements may generate so-called rebound effects, which may ‘eat up’ parts of the technical savings potential. This <a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Energy-Efficiency-human-behavior-and-economic-growth-AIP-2015.pdf">chapter in the &#8220;Physics for Sustainable Energy II conference proceedings&#8221;</a> provides a comprehensive review of existing research on these effects, raises critiques, and points out open questions. As a rough “rule of thumb”, about half the savings potential of energy efficiency improvements may be ‚eaten up’ by rebound effects.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.santarius.de/en/1360/rebound-effekt-und-sozial-%c3%b6kologische-transformation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Step Forward and Two Sideward.</title>
		<link>http://www.santarius.de/en/181/regionale-analyse-klima-konferenz-cancun-cop-16/</link>
		<comments>http://www.santarius.de/en/181/regionale-analyse-klima-konferenz-cancun-cop-16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tilman Santarius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internationale Klimaverhandlungen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Klimapolitik]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santarius.de/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the &#8220;failure of Copenhagen&#8221;, the UN climate conference in the following year, COP16 in Cancun 2010, has raised new hopes: the international climate diplomacy does not collapse. But the results of the conference show a mixed picture. In some areas, progress has been made, however, in other dubious compromises were found. In this climate policy analysis &#8220;One Step Forward and Two Sideward&#8220;, Tilman Santarius together with colleagues from seven other countries show what has been achieved in 2010 in the national climate policy of important key countries, and what key outcomes have been realized at the UN climate conference in Cancun.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/One-Step.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-204" title="Cover One Step Forward and Two Sideward" src="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/One-Step.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="172" /></a>After the &#8220;failure of Copenhagen&#8221;, the UN climate conference in the following year, COP16 in Cancun 2010, has raised new hopes: the international climate diplomacy does not collapse. But the results of the conference show a mixed picture. In some areas, progress has been made, however, in other dubious compromises were found. In this climate policy analysis &#8220;<a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/One-Step-Forward-and-Two-Sideward-2011.pdf">One Step Forward and Two Sideward</a>&#8220;, Tilman Santarius together with colleagues from seven other countries show what has been achieved in 2010 in the national climate policy of important key countries, and what key outcomes have been realized at the UN climate conference in Cancun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.santarius.de/en/181/regionale-analyse-klima-konferenz-cancun-cop-16/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failure or Opportunity?</title>
		<link>http://www.santarius.de/en/528/unfccc-cop15-kopenhagen-klimaverhandlungen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.santarius.de/en/528/unfccc-cop15-kopenhagen-klimaverhandlungen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tilman Santarius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internationale Klimaverhandlungen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Klimapolitik]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santarius.de/?p=528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Throughout Europe, the International Climate Conference in Copenhagen (COP 15) has widely been considered a failure. However, it is unclear how this summit has been perceived in other countries: as a failure, or maybe even as an opportunity? This, it seems, heavily depends on the national perspective. For some countries, such as those of the European Union, the expectations were missed completely. In the U.S. and in Brazil, however, the outcome of the summit had been used as internal political opportunity. Click here for the paper &#8220;Failure or Opportunity&#8221;, in which Tilman Santarius together with colleagues from several other countries analyzed the results of COP15 from the perspective of central negotiating parties.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Cover-Failure-or-Opportunity.png"></a><a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Cover-Failure-or-Opportunity.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1103" title="Cover Failure or Opportunity" src="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Cover-Failure-or-Opportunity-211x300.png" alt="" width="152" height="216" /></a>Throughout Europe, the International Climate Conference in Copenhagen (COP 15) has widely been considered a failure. However, it is unclear how this summit has been perceived in other countries: as a failure, or maybe even as an opportunity? This, it seems, heavily depends on the national perspective. For some countries, such as those of the European Union, the expectations were missed completely. In the U.S. and in Brazil, however, the outcome of the summit had been used as internal political opportunity. Click here for the paper <a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Failure-or-Opportunity-HBF-2010.pdf">&#8220;Failure or Opportunity&#8221;</a>, in which Tilman Santarius together with colleagues from several other countries analyzed the results of COP15 from the perspective of central negotiating parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.santarius.de/en/528/unfccc-cop15-kopenhagen-klimaverhandlungen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate and Trade &#8211; Why Climate Change Calls for Fundamental Reforms in World Trade Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.santarius.de/en/325/klima-handel-exportbedingte-emissionen-grenzausgleich-technologietransfer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.santarius.de/en/325/klima-handel-exportbedingte-emissionen-grenzausgleich-technologietransfer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 13:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tilman Santarius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Handelspolitik & Landwirtschaft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internationale Klimaverhandlungen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Klimapolitik]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santarius.de/?p=325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/Cover-Climate-and-Trade.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1094" title="Cover Climate and Trade" src="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/Cover-Climate-and-Trade.png" alt="" width="142" height="202" /></a>Foreign economic and trade policy are mostly designed along by the principles of free trade and export maximization. As a result, the world economy has become interconnected and more dense, and production chains span from one hemisphere to the other. Is this globalized world trade compatible with the aim to keep global warming below the dangerous threshold of 2 or even 1.5 degrees Celsius? Here is the study "<a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/Climate-and-Trade.pdf">Climate and Trade</a>", which highlights reform options for  trade as well as for climate policy. In particular, it raises the issues of displacement of emissions (leakage), border adjustment measures, and technology transfer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/Cover-Climate-and-Trade.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1094" title="Cover Climate and Trade" src="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/Cover-Climate-and-Trade.png" alt="" width="142" height="202" /></a>Foreign economic and trade policy are mostly designed along by the principles of free trade and export maximization. As a result, the world economy has become interconnected and more dense, and production chains span from one hemisphere to the other. Is this globalized world trade compatible with the aim to keep global warming below the dangerous threshold of 2 or even 1.5 degrees Celsius? Here is the study &#8220;<a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/Climate-and-Trade.pdf">Climate and Trade</a>&#8220;, which highlights reform options for  trade as well as for climate policy. In particular, it raises the issues of displacement of emissions (leakage), border adjustment measures, and technology transfer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.santarius.de/en/325/klima-handel-exportbedingte-emissionen-grenzausgleich-technologietransfer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From a Marathon to a Sprint.</title>
		<link>http://www.santarius.de/en/599/analyse-cop14-cop15-klimaverhandlungen-unfccc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.santarius.de/en/599/analyse-cop14-cop15-klimaverhandlungen-unfccc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tilman Santarius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internationale Klimaverhandlungen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Klimapolitik]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santarius.de/?p=599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only small progress in some areas had been achieved at the UN climate conference in Poznan (COP 14).  Solutions to the major conflicts remain to be developed, and answers to most crucial questions persist, such as how to define specific national reduction targets, financial sums, technological cooperation agreements, the regulations of emissions from forests, and others. If this load of decisions is not to be deferred entirely up to the ministerial conference in Copenhagen, negotiations have to move from jogging to the mode of a sprint. Here is the analysis &#8220;From a marathon to a sprint&#8221; in Environmental Finance magazine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Marathon.jpg"></a><a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/Cover-Environmental-Finance.gif"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-700" title="Cover Environmental Finance Magazine" src="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/Cover-Environmental-Finance.gif" alt="" width="124" height="181" /></a>Only small progress in some areas had been achieved at the UN climate conference in Poznan (COP 14).  Solutions to the major conflicts remain to be developed, and answers to most crucial questions persist, such as how to define specific national reduction targets, financial sums, technological cooperation agreements, the regulations of emissions from forests, and others. If this load of decisions is not to be deferred entirely up to the ministerial conference in Copenhagen, negotiations have to move from jogging to the mode of a sprint. Here is the analysis &#8220;<a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/From-a-Marathon-to-a-Sprint.pdf">From a marathon to a sprint</a>&#8221; in Environmental Finance magazine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.santarius.de/en/599/analyse-cop14-cop15-klimaverhandlungen-unfccc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pit Stop Poznan.</title>
		<link>http://www.santarius.de/en/583/cop14-poznan-klimakonferenz-unfccc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.santarius.de/en/583/cop14-poznan-klimakonferenz-unfccc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tilman Santarius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internationale Klimaverhandlungen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Klimapolitik]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santarius.de/?p=583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/COP14.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-584" title="Foto von UN Climate Talks auf Flickr.com mit Creative Commons Lizenz, http://www.flickr.com/photos/unfccc/3045713498/" src="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/COP14.jpg" alt="" width="128" height="188" /></a>One year after the climate conference in Bali (2007), the UN climate conference in Poznan in December 2008 marked only a stopover on the way to the next major conference in Copenhagen, 2009. a new climate agreement. Politically, the conference in Poznan was overshadowed by negotiations in Brussels on a new climate and energy package of the European Union. On many points of detail, however, the climate negotiations in Poznan did move on. Therefore it is worth looking into negotiating texts and individual agreements. Click here for the analysis "<a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/Poznan-Analyse-final-for-Website.pdf">Pit Stop Poznan</a>" by Santarius Tilman and his colleagues, a shorter version of which was published in the Journal for European Environmental &#38; Planning Law (JEEPL).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/COP14.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-584" title="Foto von UN Climate Talks auf Flickr.com mit Creative Commons Lizenz, http://www.flickr.com/photos/unfccc/3045713498/" src="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/COP14.jpg" alt="" width="128" height="188" /></a>One year after the climate conference in Bali (2007), the UN climate conference in Poznan in December 2008 marked only a stopover on the way to the next major conference in Copenhagen, 2009. a new climate agreement. Politically, the conference in Poznan was overshadowed by negotiations in Brussels on a new climate and energy package of the European Union. On many points of detail, however, the climate negotiations in Poznan did move on. Therefore it is worth looking into negotiating texts and individual agreements. Click here for the analysis &#8220;<a href="http://www.santarius.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/Poznan-Analyse-final-for-Website.pdf">Pit Stop Poznan</a>&#8221; by Santarius Tilman and his colleagues, a shorter version of which was published in the Journal for European Environmental &amp; Planning Law (JEEPL).</p>
<p>Picture from the UN Climate Talks-Logo: from Flickr.com with Creative Commons License, http://www.flickr.com/photos/unfccc/3045713498/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.santarius.de/en/583/cop14-poznan-klimakonferenz-unfccc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
